Jerry Pournelle wrote in 1983: “I have not seen any evidence that. The Lévis agreements, full of “You don`t want” – have any effect on piracy. He gave the example of an ITA that was impossible for a user to respect, and said, “Come on, Fellows. No one expects these agreements to be respected. Mr. Pournelle found that, in practice, many companies have been more generous to their customers than their ITAs, and wondered, “So why do they insist that their customers sign `agreements`, which the customer does not want to keep and which the company knows are not respected?” Should we continue to hypocritically with publishers and customers?  It`s because of you. Many companies have both, with the EULA dealing exclusively with the license and the GTC agreement everything else. Several companies have parodied this belief that users don`t read end-user license agreements by adding unusual clauses, knowing that few users will ever read them. Aprilscherz added a clause according to which users who placed an order on April 1, 2010 agreed to irrevocably give their soul to the company, which 7500 users accepted. Although there was a box to be exempted from the “soul immorts” clause, few users checked it and Gamestation concluded that 88% of their users had not read the agreement.  The PC Pitstop program contained a clause in its end-user license agreement that states that anyone who reads the clause and contacts the company receives a financial reward, but it took four months and more than 3,000 software downloads before anyone collected it.